POC Blog

The random technotheolosophical blogging of Reid S. Monaghan

Grace in Leaves...

 

Sitting in my backyard today I am watching the wind cascade through the trees causing multicolored leaves to fall like rain to the ground.  The back of our house is quite wooded so Actually they are a little more like heavy snowflakes than rain.  The weather is not too cold yet so it makes for a great vision to sit outside on the WiFi and work from a rocking chair.  In the winds of the fall it is so easy for me to think about the transient nature of life; we are all slowly passing into reality soon to be gone from the scene of the earth.  Maybe I am just getting older...or maybe it has been the Lord of the Rings Trilogy that I have been watching again of late, but life feels a bit epic today.

The finality of falling leaves is but temporary as the stripped trees of winter will rise again green come spring.  Yet life has an abrubt ending and each day ebbs us forward to this reckoning. As we have started to take the first steps of establishing Jacob's Well I am thinking much about the impact of my own life.  Sometimes you feel like you are about to change the world, other days you realize your life doesn't count for much in the grand scheme of things.  I think most everyone is realizing these days that life is more than the sum of one's 401(k).  Well, maybe we are realizing that our lives had become little more than the sums of money sitting in some virtual account on a computer somewhere.  Either way, life is moving, as do markets as does the foliage in Northeastern woodlands.

Long ago philosophers debated whether life was static in being (Parmenides) or was a ever flowing see of change which we are unable to place a finger on (Heraclitus).  I think life and perception leads us at times to both conclusions rather than a certainty of fixedness or a chaos of never ending change.  I have long thought about how God brings an unchanging constancy to our ever changing lives and world.  Is it not a search for the beauty of truth, the order of the cosmos, the one lighthouse of purpose in the world by which we can gain our bearings.  We are indeed passing like ships along a great shore, or like sand flowing in an ever changing river.  Yet there is one who holds our lives and the changing world in existence and he even knows our very names. 

Such a God is not the unmoved god of philosophy, but rather the kind and severe God of the cross of Jesus of Nazareth.  He is fixed, unchanging...yet abounding in steadfast love.  He is sovereign over time and history yet calls us to live among the falling leaves each day.  I have found both joy and solace in seeking him.  In calling out to him in trial, in questioning in pain and worshiping him in his strength and beauty. 

Long ago, another sojourner of this path had something very relevant to say to us in our uncertain and changing times.  These words of ancient wisdom press upon me today.

So we do not lose heart. Though our outer self is wasting away, our inner self is being renewed day by day. For this light momentary affliction is preparing for us an eternal weight of glory beyond all comparison, as we look not to the things that are seen but to the things that are unseen. For the things that are seen are transient, but the things that are unseen are eternal.

So the man of the earth will soon pass into the shadows of eternity and the leaves will fall again next year.  Yet as spring buds forth the tree into newness, there is the promise of one who brings life anew in the fullness of time.

I am the resurrection and the life. Whoever believes in me, though he die, yet shall he live, and everyone who lives and believes in me shall never die. Do you believe this?

This is the most relevant question I know of for all mankind. Therein lies the key to an unfading, unchanging, unfailing hope.  It is bound up in the changeless one who can have the living die so that the dead might rise again. 

 

 

 

 

Strange...

A friend sent me this link...awkward snap of the camera.  On Yahoo...all the people way too jazzed up about political wranglings please laugh today.

 

Whence Natural Theology

Some theo-geeks out there may be aware of the continental theological megaclash between Brunner and Barth in the 20th century over the place of "natural theology" in coming to a knowledge of God.  Now what is meant by natural theology is coming to a knowledge of God without special revelation - to form a view of God only form nature and reasoning.  Brunner advocated some form of this...Barth just yelled NEIN! A friend of mine and I were kicking it around a bit through e-mail and I found his thoughts clear and helpful. B&B here refers to Brunner and Barth. Emphasis is mine...

I couldn't work in one important criticism of B&B's language: they use the terms natural revelation, natural theology, and natural religion interchangeably.  I would use these terms to refer to different ideas and I think B&B use them to refer to different things....which makes B&B much harder to understand!

If God reveals himself cosmologically (in creation) , anthropologically (in humans), and Scripturally, the non-Scriptural means we call natural revelation.  Natural theology we could then define as any enterprise that places what we know about God from natural revelation on par with (above or foundational to) what know about God through Scripture.  I accept natural revelation; I reject natural theology. 

Biblical theology or let's just say theology takes Scripture as the starting point for knowledge of God and allows natural revelation a secondary and peripheral place.  We can think about God through natural revelation because we, though still in a fallen and thus humble state, can examine natural revelation in light of God's definitive self-revelation (Jesus in Scripture).  When we approach non-believers then with theistic arguments we are recognizing two things: (1) that belief in god is not equivalent to belief in God (Ex 20.2-3 & John 20.28), and any knowledge of God that takes natural revelation as the normalizing knowledge of god is idolatry. However, (2) those in whom the Spirit works will begin to recognize Him in his handiwork and when they hear true knowledge of God, in whatever form it has come to them, they will yield to it.

In other words, God reveals himself through natural revelation (transmitters of his Glory), but the receivers (our knowledge of God through them) are broken.  God's megaphone to the world falls on deaf ears.  Actually, no, God's natural revelation falls on twisted ears that turn knowledge of God into gods of our own design.  We justify our existence through them, though they come to dominate us.  Without the Spirit speaking through the lens of Scripture all knowledge of God is idolatry.  We thus stand condemned.  When we take the Scripture as our starting point we can use natural revelation as a secondary form of knowledge of God.  Some in whom the Spirit is at work will begin to recognize God through natural revelation, but we are people groping in the dark.  God might (may it be so!) use natural revelation to destroy false idols, to make us uncomfortable in our captivity to them, to prod us, and to prepare the way for true knowledge of Himself. 

So, yea, I agree!  Natural revelation has a place in evangelism: a pointer to our foundation, light, shepherd and sum of all things, King Jesus...

Back to work...

Causing people to stumble...

OK, Justin Taylor just caused me to covet.  I think this may be the sweetest chair ever (I mean bibliochaise).  This could seriously solve some space issues in the home office (which is my living room btw).

 

On the Green Bible and Saying Stupid Things...

Sometimes I just become amazed at the lack of logic and precision in our every day discourse...well, maybe I am not amazed but frustrated. It seems we have lost the desire to create valid and sound arguments in making our case.  I ran across such an example a few minutes ago when receiving an e-mail from a friend.  The e-mail was regarding The Green Bible and some of the sales pitch associated with the volume.  Let me from the outset here state clearly a few things.

First, I am 100% committed to stewardship of creation, not trashing the planet and living green in a reasonable way.  Not that I am down with worshiping creation rather than the creator like many can do...nor am I an dvocate of attempting to save ones soul by lowering one's carbon footprint.  Obviously there are forms of environmental idolatry out their that are as fanatical as any fundamentalist religion.  Yet I am thrilled to now live in a community that has a wonderful curb side recycling program and recycling centers very close to where we live.  I just replaced the light bulbs in my bathroom and bought the more expensive, but long lasting kind that use less energy and make Al Gore smile.  Furthermore, I am all for a Bible that is printed with soy ink on recycled paper.  Hooray!  OK, with that said, this is some shtick associated with the Green Bible which is troubling theologically and some that is just faulty reasoning and stupid logic.  Now on to my rant for today.

First, one of the design features of the Bible that is green is that it "green letters" the verses that mention the earth and creation care.  Now what is a bit strange about this is the format.  It could have simply highlighted the verses, had commentary etc. but in making a "Green letter" edition it is obviously connecting to the tradition in Christianity of turning some letters red.  In many Bibles the direct words of Jesus, the Lord God incarnate, are highlighted in red so as to see what he actually articulated.  This in itself is problematic in that these words are not "more important" than the other printed words but it does highlight the importance of Jesus.  What the green letter book is doing is using that to parallel the high importance of the Bible's message about "the earth."  Again, not against the earth or being green - but it does seem fishy to set off this message from the Scriptures as if it was the central focus of the book (like Jesus is).  This seems to be driven by an agenda from outside of Scripture rather than from its own pages.  OK, now on to a lesson in logical fallacies.

In its print, online and video marketing materials, the publishers of the Green Bible make this statement:

The Green Bible will equip and encourage people to see God's vision for creation and help them engage in the work of healing and sustaining it. With over 1,000 references to the earth in the Bible, compared to 490 references to heaven and 530 references to love, the Bible carries a powerful message for the earth.

http://www.greenletterbible.com/

Now, my professor in one of my graduate classes in philosophical logic used to say that we should not advocate the saying of stupid things.  He was of course referring to things that were logically fallacious in a formal sense...which of course is very much the vernacular of so much spin today.  Let me show you the message that the Green Bible team is communicating:

  • Heaven and Love are important Biblical teachings
  • Heaven and Love are mentioned only 490 and 530 times respectively in the good book
  • The "earth" is referenced over 1000 times in the Bible!
  • Therefore the earth is a very important teaching in the Bible!

Now, I am not saying that you cannot make the case for the stewardship and care for the creation from Scripture.  In fact, I think it is an easy case to make.  Yet this argument is clearly no argument at all for the importance of the earth.  It is fallacious on several levels.

First, it is a clear non sequitur; the conclusion does not follow logically from its premises. Simply because something appears in a book a number of times does not make it central to its message.  It may be significant if something is repeated but one has to look at how "earth" is used to make an argument from this.  For instance, just mentioning the earth does not make an argument for "creation care" or "contemporary environmentalism" For instance the Bible talks about the earth swallowing up people, being cursed, people bowing their face to the earth, the earth having detestable things on it, being destroyed etc. etc.  None of these have anything to do with the marketing message of the Green Bible. What the Bible actually is teaching when it refers to the earth, creation etc. is much more important than the fact that a word is used a whole bunch of times. 

Anyway, I am enjoying the turning of the leaves here in my home town and thanking God for the beauty of his world and for recycling.  Furthermore, red letter Bibles at least correctly focus a reader on the importance of Jesus.  To me the green letter one has the potential to lead some people to completely miss the main point of Scripture - the person and work of Jesus. But it could be a best seller and make people lots of money.  Yet even in the NRSV translation (which I do not recommend) there will still be good things found in the green version of the good book. So while I don't want us to buy into this nonsensical marketing spin I do hope people do read of the saving Christ...even by reading in the green book.

Jacob's Well Update...

We just posted our most recent update on our work in planting Jacob's Well.  For those interested in church planting, core group stuff...the following is a short four week study our group has gone through together covering Christology, Missiology and Ecclesiology. 

Saying a pray for all the church plants out there today...godspeed in your labors...

Piper's New Coat

Dr. John Piper recently got a new coat from the kind people of Mars Hill Church Seattle. Picked up at a skateboard park in the pacific northwest and freshened up with some Desiring God logo fabric art, John Piper just got style-warped. 

Check out the video below:

More videos and messages from the recent desiring God conference can be found here - The Power of Words and the Wonder of God

Knowing the Way...

Over the past few weeks our core group at Jacob's Well has been asking some simple questions as we start our work to establish a new church in central New Jersey.  How do we begin to establish a community which will live for the glory of God and the good of the city by extending hope through the gospel of Jesus Christ.

In order to walk in the way of Jesus we are pausing right at the beginning to look at some important questions.

  • First, if this is Jesus' church we need to know clearly who he is...he is the Christ, the one promised to be our prophet - to bring us the message of God, he is a great priest - reconnecting us to God and he is our great King - our leader in this life and the age to come. Furthermore, this "Christ" is the Son of God - he is God come to earth...God incarnate - God in a meat suit.
  • Second, we asked the question...what is Jesus' mission? What did he come to accomplish when he came to earth? We saw two things clearly: 1) To seek and save that which was lost...people far from God - con men, hookers, liars, religious people, etc. he came to forgive people and reconnect them to the Father by his death on a cross. He paid for our sins and offers grace and pardon to all who will come. 2) He came to bring a new reality - the Kingdom of God. A realm not of physical geography or political boundaries but rather a realm where the rule and reign of Jesus is supreme. This kingdom breaks through into this age, through the church, a counter cultural society where we live in the world but differently. We handle sex, money, power, alcohol, media, marriage, soccer games, etc. in a different way under the rule of Jesus our King.
  • Third, we looked at how the mission of Jesus extended through his earliest followers and how their model gives us a paradigm for our work today. Normal people, empowered by God the Holy Spirit, moves people to establish churches, communities where people are saved by Jesus and set together under his rulership and reign. Through the course of everyday commerce and living the church extended the mission of Jesus into the reaches of the Roman Empire through the ancient port cities - urban areas of cultural and economic import.

This week we close our series on Knowing the Way by looking at this society called the church and seeing what the church is and how she functions. Finally, we'll see how we live life together in a way that gives God honor, does good for our neighbors and people hear of the forgiving God of the gospel of Jesus Christ.  

Should be fun times...

A peculiar story...

The story begins with a group of scared, tired outsiders huddled together fearing for their lives because their leader had be killed as a common criminal.  They then experienced a supernatural move of the Spirit of God upon them and they were changed from cowards to courageous and began sharing good news in Jerusalem.  God shows up and saves well over three thousand people through the preaching of the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus for sin and sinners.  God then takes a jack hammer to the First Megachurch of Jerusalem by allowing his people to be persecuted and scattered out into the surrounding provinces.  "The wrong kind of people" also start to meet Jesus and this causes God's people to be unsure if he can do that or not.  Of course God corrects these guys and proves to them that he is indeed on mission to save people from every nation on the earth not simply those who are just like them.

A royal official from Ethiopia just happened to be reading a copy of the scroll of Isaiah and one of Jesus' followers shows up and tells him how the Old Testament he was reading has been fulfilled in Jesus.  Tradition holds that this man went back to Africa following Jesus' on his mission founding one of the oldest Christian communities on the earth.

Then a short guy named Saul is pretty hacked off about all of this and works to shut down the Jesus operation.  Jesus then shines a light in his eyes like a criminal on C.O.P.S. and then knocks him off his horse and tells him to switch teams.  Jesus forgives him, stands him up and then tells him that he will now be his representative to the world.  The persecutor of the church now will become an apostle of the church.  So the Christian killer Saul becomes the Jesus guy Paul. 

A new church in the big city of Antioch began to form and decides to send Paul and Barnabas (son of encouragement) out to preach the good news of Jesus among the Gentiles.  They hit up six or so cities and many people there become followers of Jesus and they go back to Antioch to party and celebrate what God had done.  There is a little drama about whether gentile believers should have to be circumcised and obey the Jewish law to be followers of Jesus, so an apostles meeting in Jerusalem is called and they decide that they can follow him without taking on the whole Jewish system.  The Gentile men who had become Christians all shouted amen (well, this is historical speculation).

Next Paul decided that Barnabas wasn't so encouraging any more as they disagree on whether to take John Mark with them out on their second road trip for Jesus.  Mark had had punked out on them in Pamphylia on an earlier trip and Paul didn't want to go through that again.  Barnabas wanted to encourage Mark so one team became two as Barnabas and Mark and Paul with new teammate Silas went out again to preach good news and strengthen the churches which were born on their first trip.

A young man named Timothy joins Paul and Silas and they have a great church planting trip in Philippi where God saves a wealthy businesswoman and starts a church in her house.  Oh yeah, also a demon possessed fortune telling slave girl is set free from darkness but then Paul and Silas get beat up and thrown in jail by the a crowd stirred up by the girl's owners. Apparently they lost a lucrative contract for her on the Sci Fi channel and were pretty angry losing a fortune after losing their fortune telling demon slave girl.  But God shakes the jail, saves the jailer and his household and along with the rich business woman and the fortune telling girl a new church in the township of Philippi was born.

Paul and his friends continue their travels and end up starting all sorts of sanctified trouble in the port cities of the empire and planting churches in such cities as Thessalonica, Ephesus and an ancient Las Vegas...uh, I mean, Corinth.  He is joined by several others along the way including a dynamic duo couple Pricilla and Aquila who seemed to travel and plant a church in their home just about everywhere their business as craftsmen took them.

Paul finally gets in so much trouble that he ends up in a jail cell in the ancient power center of Rome where he wrote much of the Bible to the churches that he had started in his travels...by the way, this is the story of the birth of the Christian church.

POC Bundle 9.24.2008

History and Biography

It seems that George Marsden's excellent (and massive) biography of Jonathan Edwards has now been abridged into a shorter version.  From now on call this one Lil Edwards (160 pages) and the former award winning volume Big Edwards (640 pages)

On Science

Almost three years ago I preached a message entitled "Space" at the Inversion Fellowship.  It was a fun night contemplating the vast creativity of God as seen in the universe.  We showed a video clip that night...and had some massive technical difficulties.  The video was a special feature from the DVD The Privileged Planet.  Looks like someone has embedded it online in flash.  It is an awesome video which displays the biblical understatement: As high as the heavens are above the earth, so great is his steadfast love toward those who fear him - Psalm 103:11 - You can watch the video on this blog here.

The Church

Matt Chandler is now blogging and will no longer be mocking bloggers...here were his reasons for not entering the blog world:

  • I have plenty to do already and don’t want any new tasks.
  • I am not sure that writing is a strength of mine.
  • I don’t want to debate with a hyper fundamentalist from Idaho who thinks that because I don’t use the King James I am leading people to hell. (If I got a letter from that guy you know he’ll find me online.)
  • Last but not least, I desperately want to continue to make fun of blogs and bloggers. If I enter the blogosphere then it would be hypocritical to continually mock them.
Chandler is a pastor in the great nation of Texas, a passionate preacher and on the board of the church planting network with which we roll...he has also shown fine taste in naming his son...you'll do well to check out his stuff.

Commentary on Futility...

Source - "Duty Calls" Copyright xkcd - some stuff on this site is not as savory - use caution.

(HT - Tim Dees)

Book Review - There is a God by Anthony Flew and Roy Varghese

Book Review - Anthony Flew, There is No/A God - How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind, (New York: HarperOne, 2007) 222 pp.

People love testimonies; we also love reading biography.  Particularly we really love stories of how someone’s life or ideas radically change from their previous orientation.  For those who have been interested in the analytic philosophy of religion over certainly had their eyebrows raised when Anthony Flew, one of the prominent anti-theistic philosophers of the last half century, announced in 2004 that he had changed his mind on a very important issue.  He had come to believe in God.

There is No/A God - How the World’s Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind is the recounting of the life and intellectual journey of Anthony Flew, written in a rather autobiographical manner by the man himself.  The book has a great introduction where Flew lays out the content of the book and the journey it will entail.  Part I is comprised of three chapters chronicling his experience growing up in the house of his Father, a thoughtful Methodist minister and biblical scholar.  It traces his growing interest in critical thinking and following a method put forth in the writing of Plato; like Socrates, he would be dedicated to following the evidence in life wherever it leads.  His development as a student, his growth as a philosopher and his profound and influential contributions to the philosophy of religion are all covered in this section.  It is not an understatement to say that Flew’s work literally set the stage for the last 60 years of discussion from the point of view of those who disbelieved in God.   

Part II of the book covers several lines of evidence, mainly located in the new discoveries of modern science, which brought him to his new conclusion that God exists.  The book concludes with two useful appendices, one on existential reasons for belief in a divine mind by Roy Abraham Varghese and the second a treatment by NT Wright on the historical Christian view of God revealing himself in Jesus Christ.  In this review I will cover some strengths of the book categorizing them under the headers of Biography, History, Philosophy and Science.  I will then cover a few small weakness I found with this volume and then give some concluding thoughts on the helpfulness (or lack thereof) of a book of this sort.

One more issue needs to be addressed before launching into the review.  As one can imagine the book has been surrounded by some vitriol and controversy.  On the atheistic side you read a recounting of a senile old man being duped by eager evangelicals to see things their way (See Mark Oppenheimer’s lengthy treatment in the New York Times Magazine for a good look at this).  On the theistic side you see a heartfelt narrative of friendship and the honest intellectual journey (see Christian philosopher Gary Habermas’ thoughts in his book review here) of an intellectually honest scholar and gentlemen.  What is the truth of the matter?  One is hard pressed to know.  The book’s publisher, HarperOne, is standing fully behind the book and that Flew, although assisted in its writing, stood fully behind it content.  The bottom line is that Anthony Flew’s journey is now deeply affected by dementia - in his last years his mind is fading.  So we have two sides to this story and many have much to gain from it.  The truth of all matters may not be known but clearly Anthony Flew did indeed change his mind and it is a process that began decades ago.  I’ll let the reader sort through the realities of this controversy - but as always, there are two sides to every story and these two sides are philosophers debating God - a virtual bee hive of passion, erudition and arrogance.  The full truth about the story of Anthony Flew may only be known in the Divine Mind, yet the book is out in the world with his name fully behind it.  So on to the review.

Strengths of the Book

Biography

Some of the most pleasant portions of the book were the human contours on display of Flew’s own life and intellectual journey.  The beginning pages feature Flew as a young boarding school student using the intellectual tools given to him by his critical thinking Christian father.  He clearly said the tools which his father gave him were those which turned him away from his father’s faith.   He is very clear that by the time he left boarding school he had left belief in God behind.  He attempted to keep it on the down low for several years and seemed to succeed but by the time his parents were aware of the change he was far down an anti-theistic road.  One story that really grabbed me was his experience in pre World War II Europe and his witness of harsh Antisemitism and the rise of totalitarianism; two things which were the object of his disdain.  Rightly so.   Overall, I enjoyed reading his story as life and philosophical career unfolded.  It is quite a who’s who in 20th century philosophy and that history seemed alive to me and leads me to the second strength I enjoyed in the book.

History

For those interested in the history of 20th century philosophy will not find a historical introduction or tour de force in this volume.  Yet those who are acquainted with the history of philosophy will love the narrative found in Part I of the book.  From his membership and participation in CS Lewis’ Socratic club (22-24) at Oxford where theist and atheist would enter into cage matches together to his publishing of his early paper Theology and Falsification which would set the tone of late 20th century debates in analytic philosophy of religion.  Wittgenstein, AJ Ayer and logical positivism, Bertrand Russell, Richard Swinburne, Alvin Plantinga and many others are discussed in the narrative.  Those uninitiated with philosophical schools and ideas may feel a bit left out but those familiar will find much in the narrative to wax nostalgic about.  There is even Flew’s recounting of several debates over the decades with various theists even one that is positioned as a team debate showdown at the OK Corral (69, 70)

Philosophy

Now this book is written at a popular and not a technical level of philosophy. Yet the volume still affords some helpful insights which are found more fully in other works.  For instance, the discussion on the burden of proof in the question of God (who has to prove her claims, the theist or the agnostic?) is helpful.  Flew is well known for placing the burden of proof on the one who believes in God in the mid 20th century. This provoked some really excellent scholarship and discussion about who must prove what in order to be rational.  The work of Alvin Plantinga, in his discussions of Warrant and Proper Function, come to mind.  Plantinga argues that it is completely rational and basic to believe in God without proof save that the person is willing to address rational challenges to faith (defeater beliefs).  There is also a great quote summarizing the work of Anthony Kenny which puts the agnostic back in the debate to argue FOR something and not just put the burden on the theist. 

But he said this does not let agnostics off the hook; a candidate for an examination may be able to justify the claim that he or she does not know the answer to one of the questions, but this does not enable the person to pass the examination. (54, emphasis mine)

So the agnostic must also argue his case and attempt to show reasons why he knows that others do not know about the issue of God.  I have always been amazed by people who confidently think that others do not know about God, while claiming they do not personally know either.

There is also a discussion of Hume that philosophically minded people will enjoy even if you do not agree with the conclusions made.  I tend to agree with the book that Hume’s skepticism about causation, the reality of the external world and the persistent self are all unlivable intellectual games that Hume himself did not adhere.

Science

The final strength I found in the book was the basic and popular treatment of some scientific developments of the 20th century.  Schroeder’s refutation of the popular illustration that “if you give monkeys a typewriter and enough time they will eventually bang out the works of Shakespeare” to be wonderfully persuasive (see pages 74-78). Additionally, Chapter 7’s treatment of codes, DNA information transfer and mapping was very engaging.  The treatment of self directed, self replicating and encoded biological systems does seem to create massive problems if it is only the work of mindless matter. 

While I really enjoyed the book there were a few drawbacks which did seem to leer out at me as well.  I’ll cover them briefly in this order. First, the denseness of some philosophical ideas was not ameliorated for the popular level reader. Second, his distinction between physical and human causes in wrestling with determinism brought up some serious problems for me.  Third, a few chapters in the latter part of the book were just anemic and underdeveloped.  I’ll cover each in turn.

A Few Weaknesses

The Philosophical Shroud

As a book written for a popular audience I found a few times some dense stuff that philosophers enjoy left dangling before the reader in a rather obfuscated manner.  One quick beauty from Richard Swinburne will illustrate nicely why freshman in college can end up hating philosophy (or loving it - smile)

He reasoned that the fact that only O’s we have ever seen are X does not simply imply that it is not coherent to suppose that there are O’s that are not X.  He said that no one has any business arguing that, just because all so-and-so’s with which they happen themselves to have been acquainted were such-and-such, therefore such-and-suchness must be an essential characteristic of anything that is to be properly related to a so-and-so. (51)

Yeah, sometimes philosophy rolls that way…and it is a good point if you take the time to think it through…but most folks will read that and become cross-eyed and wonder what is the point.

Causality Confusion

A second area of weakness was his bifurcation of causes presented in his wrestling with the idea of free-will and determinism.  A little background.  Most all atheists are determinists.  They see the world as a closed system of cause and effect which is the result of matter operating according to natural law.  All things we see are the result of matter interacting.  This includes human actions, thoughts, decisions etc. Therefore free-will, in this view, is an illusion for it is just the bumping of matter in specialized patterns in your brain.  Of course this is very counter intuitive as we make a myriad of choices every day whereby we can “choose” action A or B.  Flew’s solution was to make a distinction between physical causes and human causes.  Physical causes are those that must happen according to natural laws and physics and human choices are a different sort of agent caused events which do not necessitate A or B but rather incline a person towards a choice (see 60,61)

Now, I have no problem in distinguishing causes this way but one who rejects a spiritual view of persons, that we are only one substance/matter, have a hard time finding where to get such “agents” from.  If there is nothing but a body/brain, then there is nothing else happening.  There is no metaphysical “YOU” who can make choices (whether free choices or those compatible with other factors).  Later in the book he indeed repudiates the type of mind/body anthropology which would make his cause distinction possible (see 150).  So I found his rejection of materialistic determinism to be weak in light of his physicalist anthropology.  Now for those who maintain a psychosomatic soul-body dualism do have a embodied person who can make choices.  For those who do not hold this view, such causal distinctions are nonsense and determinism seems to hold.

Less than Strong Chapters

Finally, I found chapter 6 of the anthropic principle to be underdeveloped and chapter 9 on how a incorporeal spirit can act in the world unsatisfying. The latter would have been greatly aided by a discussion of speech acts, how an agent actually accomplishes things by speaking and decreeing which to me seems to be how God immediately acts within space time.  Speech Act theory is of great interest as we see it in human affairs in the act of declaring a party guilty or pronouncing a couple husband and wife.  Though God’s speech acts are of a different species in that they actually do things that are “godlike” create matter, raise the dead etc. studies in speech act theory give us an understanding how God might accomplish things by his Word.

Concluding Thoughts

In conclusion I will say only a few things.  First, I really enjoyed the subject matter, history and discussions found in There is a God.  Second, my question is whether the controversy surrounding the volume make it useful as an apologetic for God with the general public.  My answer is yes and no.  Those who are from the camp of philosophical atheism, those who read Skeptic magazine and have read Flew’s previous works as gospel, will be unmoved by this book.  Yet for those who do not believe “the old senile Flew was duped by theists” story the volume is very helpful in showing that some people do change their minds and find good reasons to do so.  So with that in mind I do recommend There is a God for use with those who are wrestling with the question of God. Recommended.

POC Bundle 9.19.2008

On Science

  • The new humanist takes on a book about Intelligent Design (again...yawn) 
  • Mini-me Cows are catching on - little, yellow (well maybe not yellow), different.
  • Daniel Dennett - anti-God crusader is interviewed by Search Magazine.  In case you didn't know Dennett can explain all things...and you don't have any choice in any matter.  If you cannot recognize Dennett's "God" - you are not alone.  It is a scrawny little deity that is a figment of his meat machine (brain).

Islamic Watch

The Church

  • Now someone may want to be a playa, and their wheels ain't fly...yeah, hit em up and get a pimped out ride.  But I highly suggest that it is not a good idea to "pimp my church" - this is what happens when you try too hard to be cool. If you are saying "huh" - there is a page for you to read -really, go here: huh? My favorite line: The church is as "fly" (translation - cool or hip) as we dream it and create it to be. To the brothers and sisters of this church - I'm not a hata (translation - I am for you...but this ain't fly)

General News

  • Interesting article about the intellectual acumen of today's university students. Check out On Stupidity over at the Chronicle of Higher Education.  Mr. Benton and I obviously do not share the same worldview...but I feel some common concern for the state of learning in our nation.

Why I come back to the blog...

Some of you may be wondering - what gives over at the POCBlog...Reid hasn't posted anything here in almost two weeks.  Yeah, me too - I am wondering that as well except that I know precisely why I have not posted here.  To be honest, my life is full of several things these days which I truly enjoy...though I need to make more time for doing push ups (I still think this is not a challenge though).

My wife Kasey and I have been married for over twelve years and I truly enjoy her company and making her laugh.  I like throwing on an episode of our favorite SciFi show and just get lost with her in futuristic world that makes both of us go Hmm. I also have two little girls that I am seeing quite a bit more these days as my office is in my living room (seriously, my living room is an office/library).  This has made interacting with the girls more readily available for us all and quite enjoyable.  I spend less time in the car and for the most part I can still focus on work that needs to get done.  After all, when your girls make home made T-shirts that say "We Love New Jersey...Jersey Girls...Go Rutgers" you just have to shut down the e-mail, give some high fives and hugs. 


There is also this strange bouncy creature that speeds up and down the highways and byways, kitchen and hallways...having a son is more fun than I imagined and his hugs, head butts and headache inducing two year old flow add a certain zesty and testy flavor to the Monaghan home team.

Furthermore, we are just a few weeks in from gathering together as a small house church called Jacob's Well.  It has been a great privilege to chart the course for our community under the good hand of God.  We have been meeting new people, believers and not, and trying to make sense of new lives, new schedules, new culture and new flow in a new community.  We have also been going to Athletes in Action meetings again...it is great to be back around  the AIA community again. To be honest - I love what we are doing these days. 

The other night I hung out with a new guy at our church watching Monday Night Football and throwing down nachos with a Yuenlings.  A fun night as I enjoyed the depth of a new friend who thinks and cares deeply about life.  We also watched DeSean Jackson showboat into the end zone for the Eagles dropping the ball a weeeee little early on the one yard line.  Fantasy football people know this play - it determined some outcomes!  Shout out from Reid and Shaun to my boys Schaeffer and Jay.  Additionally, the other day I met a guy at a networking gig who had great questions about God, family etc. A guy who naturally shared with me that he doesn't believe but his interest seemed to be piqued as we talked.  I like learning from people like him and helping in any way I can in someone's road towards God.  Yes life can be full these days.

Yet I am back here on the POCBlog again - writing away.  I have thought over the last couple of weeks about my longing to return to some blogging.  I have had zero thoughts that the blog coaches give: "You better post regularly to keep readers coming back"  "You better post new and original content or people get bored" - Yeah, I know.  To be honest I don't write on the blog here for any sort of reason like that.  Quite simply, I want and feel a need to write...I just like it, it is something I enjoy and the interactions with you guys in the comments is enjoyable as well.  Plus once in a while something useful comes out (this post...not gonna be one of those).

Anyway, I am on a plane heading to Seattle for some Pastor Training meetings (the amount of reading and writing for this gig has kept the last few days a bit busy as well) and some time with some friends who are about the Kings business.  I am pretty stoked as the time in planes and in airports today has afforded some thought and reading.  I am pretty jazzed about a book I am racing through here on the plane...There is not (A) God by Anthony Flew and Roy Abraham Varghese.  It is by and about one of the more prominent atheistic philosophers who four years came to believe in a intelligent God.  Look for a review (likely to be glowing) here soon...

So I return again to these pages called Power of Change - to scribble and think, laugh and wink and enjoy the company of friends.  So the technotheolosophical random blogging goes on...

Oh yeah, one last thing.  You know that snotty little "I'm a Mac" guy that looks down on the whole world because of the type of computer he is?  Well, he has finally been answered in a little ad by Mikeysoft.  My name is Reid and "I'm a PC" so don't stereotype me. Grace and Peace to you on International Talk Like a Pirate Day.

Arrrrgh!

 

Pray for India

 


I know it is not getting much media play, but there is some terrible violence being directed at Christians by Hindu factions in Orissa, India.  Churches are being burned, people hacked to death...please pray for the people there.  We have received reports from some friends with some details about the situation and it is truly perilous and sickening. 

It seems some US leaders in Congress are at least paying attention. We hope the issues can be resolved on the ground and order be established by those responsible.  Please pray for Indian Christians under severe persecution.

POC Bundle 9.09.2008

General News

Technology


Sometimes I am left without words...

These guys are awesome - I hoped this was a parody - but the sad thing is that this is likely actual footage.  Please mourn with me...for all the mockers out there...Jesus can be your friend too...but you don't have to roll like this.

Here are my favorite lines

  • He taught me how to turn the cheeck when people laugh at me...uh, good thing
  • He taught me how to praise my God and still play rock and roll...uh, is this rock and roll?
  • He is like a Mounty he always gets his man...then I think he then said "zap" or something...scary.
(HT - Tim Dees - who is my friend)

The Interconnected Relationship of Family and Church

Throughout Scripture we see a beautiful metaphor emerging for that of God’s people; we are called a family.  As God’s created design has each of us born from the union of a mother and father we uniquely can understand what it means to be the family of God.  Yet in our day of gender confusion, family fissures and forgotten fatherhood it is something which can easily be lost upon contemporary believers.  What must be regained is a simultaneous resurgence of the family at home and the family of church.  These two are interconnected in Scripture and need to be reconnected in our day.  It may no longer be assumed that people see a loving family on their way through childhood so that church can offer a family to the familyless.  Additionally, the church can mentor young men and women to establish new families in our day which might again unite the church as a family in ever deeper ways.  In the short essay we will do three things.  First, we will outline what Scripture teaches about the family of home and the family of church.  Second, we will look at the nexus of family/church relationships and leadership.  Third, we will explain how we see this interconnection being lived out in the complexities of our lives together in the 21st century in face paced central New Jersey.

An Outline of Biblical Teaching

  • We all come from an original family consisting of one man and one woman. He builds families through Fathers and Mothers (Genesis 1-2, 1 Corinthians 11:11,12)
  • This family’s sin corrupted us all and results in painful family relationships which expand into the false gospels of culture (Genesis 3-11)
  • God reveals himself to us as Father (Jesus’ most used term for God)
  • He calls parents, within covenant community with others, to be the primary shaping influence on children (Deuteronomy 6)
  • Children are set apart as holy, part of the covenant community, by virtue of their believing parents (1 Corinthians 7)
  • Fathers and Mothers have unique and irreplaceable roles (Deuteronomy 6, Proverbs 31,1 Thes 2, Ephesians 5-6, Colossians 3)
  • The church is a family of brothers, sisters, fathers and mothers (1 Timothy 5)
  • The church community serves parents in their role and bear burdens along with them (Ephesians 4-6, Galatians 6)
  • Parents serve others in the church by modeling Christ in the family (Ephesians 5) and training the next generation of mothers and fathers (Titus 2)
  • The government of church is based upon the government of home - Husband is head who is to honor and serve his wife in sacrificial, life giving kindness (1 Corinthians 11, Ephesians 5, Colossians 3:19, 1 Peter 3:7) and woman is helper (Gen 2:18-24). Her response to his servant leadership is submission (Ephesians 5, Colossians 3:18 1 Peter 3:1-6) and his response to her helpful leadership is praise (Proverbs 31)
  • The Husband is a servant of his wife loving and leading sacrificially like Jesus. He is to give his life for her and bring his children up in the fear and instruction of God (Ephesians 5-6, Colossians 3:20,21)

The Family/Church Nexus

The interconnectedness of church and family is visible both in our relationships and the leadership/authority God gives to his people.  The following two diagrams demonstrate our relationships to Christ, Church and Family as well as the gracious gift of leadership given by God to his people.  Each one will be treated in turn.

Our Relational Reality

Scripture teaches that all believers are “in union with Christ” (Col 3).  Furthermore the church universal and invisible is called his very body and the temple where Christ dwells by his Spirit.  So relationally speaking, church, home and believer all exist in the realm of unity with Jesus…in the figure below Christ is in all and encompasses all.  Furthermore, all Christians exist in the covenant community called the church - the one’s called out together for God’s purposes, worship and mission in the world.  Finally, all families, the arrangement of home, are in relational community with others (single, married, widowed, divorced) who are in covenant with Jesus.  So the Christian is in family, which is in covenant community which all exists by Jesus and for Jesus…see figure 1 below.

Figure 1 - Relational reality in Christ, in Covenant, in Family

Under Servant Leadership

The Scripture uses wonderful terminology for describing the leadership God has graciously given his people.  Jesus is called the bridegroom and husband of the church, he is called the head of the body (the church) and he is called our good and chief shepherd.  So all authority in heaven and on earth has been given by the Father to the Jesus (Matthew 28:18-20) and we live under his leadership each day.  Jesus fulfills all the types of anointed covenant leadership expressed in the Old Testament offices of Israel.  He is our true prophet, the incarnate Word, bring the Word of God to his people.  He is our great high priest ever interceding for his people before his father as our one covenant mediator. He is our great King who leads his people through spiritual battle as we sojourn on mission with him in this word.  Furthermore his leadership is one of a servant, who willingly washes his followers’ feet and shows his great love for his family by laying his life down for them.  There is no greater love than that of Jesus and he is both the model and the means to all servant leadership in God’s family. 

Jesus has called then calls some of his men to be elders/overseers/pastors to follow him as willing under shepherds giving their lives in service to God and his flock (1 Peter 5:1-5).  These pastors are to be examples to others, model godly leadership in their own homes, love their wives and kids with Jesus as their God and leader.  They are to proclaim the Word of God as Jesus ministers his word to his people.  They are to lead people to Jesus in baptism and the Lord’s Supper the appointed signs which point to Jesus’ priestly role in bringing us to the Father.  They are to exercise godly leadership and discipline in the church to help God’s people grow and follow Jesus who is King.  Under the care of the pastors of the church are the families of God, small communities organized under Jesus as well.

The fathers in the home serve as extensions of Jesus leadership to their families. Men are to serve as prophets, bringing Jesus’ word to their homes.  They are priests to lead the family in worship to God.  They are kings who are to manage their households well.  There is no believer who is not under God’s gracious authority. The family and the church are all under Jesus as Lord.

One note must be made from Jesus himself; we cannot take this more seriously.  This is the account of John Mark in chapter 10 of his account of the life and teaching of Jesus:

42 And Jesus called them to him and said to them, “You know that those who are considered rulers of the Gentiles lord it over them, and their great ones exercise authority over them. 43 But it shall not be so among you. But whoever would be great among you must be your servant, 44 and whoever would be first among you must be slave of all. 45 For even the Son of Man came not to be served but to serve, and to give his life as a ransom for many.”

In our day where pastors can pimp the church for profit, power and posterity it is important for God’s men to wrap the towel around the waist and wash the feet of the household of God.  We need more men who serve and honor their wives empowering them to their God given callings.  We need more men who will teach, mentor, instruct and discipline the kids that they love deeply.  We need more pastors who are more like Jesus and less like the power brokers of politics and the corporate ladders. 

In summary, Jesus is senior pastor and good shepherd; his realm of authority is all things heaven and earth.  His pastors shepherd the church under his guidance in covenant communities where families are lovingly served by husband-fathers who extend gracious leadership in the home.  The following demonstrates the overlapping realms of Jesus’ authority.


Figure 2 - Leadership - Responsible Christ, Responsible Pastors, Responsible Fathers

All theology must not remain conceptual but needs to find a grip on everyday life in all contexts to which Jesus has called his church.  Jacob’s Well is called to live out the realm of home and church in a fast paced, success oriented, power hungry culture of central New Jersey.  As part of the New York City metro area, with institutions of education, medicine and business all around, families must swim against the tide of culture to have families together for the gospel of Jesus Christ.  To this task we now turn.

Living in 21st Century Central New Jersey

As we look at life and culture in the northeastern United States we find a people that are on the treadmill of 21st century life and business.  Many people do not live in the same town in which they work with some commuting anywhere from 30 min to 2 hours each way.  Time and finances are stretched for many and both parents working is many times the rule for those with children.  In this cultural fabric we must work to, no fight, to maintain a different rhythm of life.  We must carve out a rhythm where families can still walk together in spiritual formation and real community as the people of God.  The following are but a few lines in the battle.

Fight for Meal Time (with Family)

In order for families to grow in grace men and women need to fight to share a common meal together.  This will be a matter of schedule and priority for moms and dads to shape each day to make this a reality. Some families may find an early morning breakfast table easier to achieve while others may seek the solace of a dinner table appointment.  Either way, a time to eat, share Scripture, pray for one another and worship must be found.  A meal is a great thing to fight for.  Suggestions for content and structure for such devotions is being provided in our Jacob’s Well Family Worship piece currently under development.

Fight for Face Time (with Kids)

To respond to the biblical commands for parents, specifically fathers, to instruct children in the faith several things are needed.  First, it requires a committed relationship where kids trust can grow in the voice, teaching and character of their parents.  Kids need to see and be with their parents to learn to trust them.  Furthermore parents need to engage kids in active, real life learning in the course of everyday living. In other words, teaching needs to happen when you sit in your house, and when you walk by the way, and when you lie down, and when you rise. This will require significant face time in the course of everyday life.  Men and women will need to schedule well, carve out time, and exercise discipline in order to configure schedules to be able to walk along side their kids.

Fight for Date Time (with your Spouse)

Many times parents can be so focused on their kids that they forget that their first relationship before God is their own marriage covenant.  Part of raising kids in a context of the gospel is allowing them to see God displayed in marriage (Ephesians 5), to see forgiveness granted for sin in real relationships, to observe healthy conflict and reconciliation and to grasp the meaning of the gospel lived out in their home. Kids will learn about masculinity and femininity as parents live out the marriage relationship with them.  Additionally, God has given marriage to bless his people and the joy and refuge which a husband and wife can be to one another is a treasure that the busyness of life often robs from us.  So we want to encourage creative ways for husbands and wives to be together.  We encourage couples to keep a regular date night as a practical measure of carving out time.  This can be something as simple as slow time together on the couch, a leisurely stroll, going shopping (yes men, you can do it) or something fun that requires a bit of cash.  The point is to have the flow of life directed so that you can get time together.

Fight for Faith Time (with our Church)

Many churches excessively burden families with such a dizzying flurry of programs that the average Christian has little to no free time for other things.  Churches should slow it down to a very minimum amount of activities so that families can spend time together and on mission in their respective communities.  Simplicity should be valued and practiced when putting together a church calendar.  With that said, we are still to come together for Word and Sacrament and a corporate expression of worship before God.  This requires a commitment to unite as a family for the worship of God.  The church’s ministry to children should supplement and undergird the teaching and discipleship ministry of the parents.  Older men and women and more mature Christians should teach and model parenting to new families and provide curriculum and resources to help the family towards certain devotional realities in the home. 

Fight for Mission Time (with friends, families, co-workers and comrades)

Finally, Jesus is on mission in the world among the lost and the hurting.  He calls his church and sends us on mission with him in our world.  If Christians only have time for their family, their work and their church stuff there is usually no time left for mission. Let me revisit for a moment parents spending time with their kids.  If we see all of life as mission and our nature and identity as his sent people families will be engaged in more activities that watching “safe” TV and playing Jenga on the weekends. Our families need to be on mission with Jesus in all things.  Be it with other families at the soccer field, getting to know neighbors on an evening walk/bike ride, serving those in need, visiting the sick, celebrating at weddings, etc. etc. Those who live the mission of Jesus with their kids in all of life will find they might just see Jesus as more than “their parent’s religion.”

All of these require margin…work to change the rhythm of the day so that life can happen…God give grace as we work together towards a lifestyle where family, work, mission are found daily under the rule and reign of Jesus.

 

Suffering - A Transcendent Clue

 

 

I have been pondering this question quite a bit...using Aristotelian/Thomistic categories. Is evil/suffering/pain/death etc. essential/substantial or accidental to this world and human experience?

I find the answer from a framework of naturalism must say "this is essential...fundamental to the way things are." Death, survival, reproduction...genes moving on through the cosmos perhaps hindered by our memes along the way.

Yet this seems to be strange because we seem to create a "problem of evil" - as if evil is a problem. and not a simple fact of the world.  In a theistic worldview, evil is accidental, not essential and hence a "problem" - but this only makes sense if there is a good world...somehow gone bad with an alien invasion of suffering which is constant and objectionable by the creature.

So...essential or accidental? The answer to this question seems to set one's trajectory in life. Ask yourself a question - does your own suffering seem "right and normal" or really something "wrong."

Worth your time to think about...

Chrome is Cool

OK, I should be getting some sleep but I have been wired all day and thinking too much about well...too many things.  Anyway, I wanted to let you guys know that Google's new web browser, Chrome...is pretty cool.

It is still beta software (meaning it is a work in progress...but you know Google calls everything beta just so you won't think it sucks if something doesn't work right) so there are some kinks. I have had a few tiny hiccups running Facebook and its inline spell checker won't work in my Movable Type Blog entry interface (a HUGE deal for me). Anyway, if you have not checked it out hop on over to this link http://www.google.com/chrome. There are some cool short vids and even a comic book (yes, really) explaining the features of the new platform.  

Just so you know - this is Google's OS play - they want to control the space that applications run in on your browser. It is an end around both OS X and Windows (or Ubuntu if you like) so developers can write software for the browser and not a certain OS API.  Kind of cool...but to be honest I like things that have a client and cloud computing combination...perhaps if Google can actually get Gears to work well it will be an interesting platform.  Yet for now I like it that I can get all my stuff to interoperate - I connectc to Exchange with Outlook, sync automatically to Google Calendar where I can see my stuff and our family's stuff overlaid with each other...and can access it all from my Palm Centro. 

In the evolving computer world this is an interesting play...whether they will take browser share from Internet Explorer or canibalize the market share gains garnered by FireFox is yet to be seen.  I will say that most people who are tech saavy have moved to the Fox...so it seems to me it isn't grandma who will switch or consider switching to Chrome - but FireFox users like me...if they can get spell check to work in ALL web forms. Those special nerds who use WebKit will enjoy Chrome - it is based on that rendering engine.  

Enjoy...